← Back to Learn AI

AI for Leaders

Strategy, readiness, and real frameworks — without hype, jargon, or vendor agendas.

👤 Who This Is For

This is built for executives, directors, and business leaders who need to make AI decisions — and who are willing to learn AI themselves first.

Business leaders & execs
Directors & functional heads
Product, marketing, ops leaders
Non-technical decision-makers

🎓 Rule #1: Learn It Yourself First

Here's the thing: you shouldn't demand your teams adopt AI if you haven't used it yourself.

Before you roll out AI initiatives, before you set expectations for your teams, before you make any big decisions — you need to actually use it. Regularly. For real work.

This isn't about becoming a technical expert. It's about understanding what AI actually does, where it helps, where it breaks down, and what it feels like to work with it. You can't lead an AI transformation if you don't know the tool.

Set the example. Your teams are watching. If you're asking them to change how they work, show them you're willing to do the same.

Related: Why "talking to AI" is actually a skill

💬 Be Honest About Why You're Using AI

Let's talk about what AI should — and shouldn't — be for.

✅ Use AI to:

  • Get efficiency — then do more with it
  • Free up time for creative thinking
  • Reduce stress and tedious work for employees
  • Let people focus on higher-value problems
  • Amplify your team's capabilities

❌ Not to:

  • Lay people off
  • Replace human judgment entirely
  • Cut corners on quality
  • Avoid accountability
  • Treat employees as interchangeable

💡 The real opportunity: When you reduce time and stress on employees, you get intangible benefits too — happier teams, less turnover, less recruiting headache, less time training replacements. And healthier people.

Related: The future of AI isn't automation — it's amplification

🎯 The 5 AI Value Levers

Almost every legitimate AI use case fits into one of these. If an AI idea doesn't clearly map to one, it's probably noise.

💰

Revenue Growth

Personalization, better targeting, faster experimentation, new product experiences

✂️

Cost Reduction

Automation of repetitive work, fewer handoffs, lower error rates

Speed & Cycle Time

Faster research, quicker drafts, shorter decision loops

Quality & Consistency

Standardized outputs, fewer mistakes, better documentation

🧠

Insight & Decisions

Pattern detection, scenario modeling, synthesis of messy information

⚡ What AI Is Actually Good At (and Bad At)

✅ AI is strong at:

  • Drafting, summarizing, and synthesizing
  • Pattern recognition across large inputs
  • Repetitive cognitive work
  • Assisting humans mid-process

❌ AI is weak at:

  • Owning outcomes
  • Context without guidance
  • Accountability
  • Judgment without humans

💡 Strategic rule: AI should compress effort, not replace responsibility.

📧 Don't Fall Into the Email Trap

Here's the most common mistake: teams adopt AI, and all they use it for is writing emails and drafts.

That's the vending machine problem. Prompt in, output out, done. It's fast, but it's also why most companies aren't seeing real AI value.

If AI only helps with email, you've only solved the smallest problem. The real value is in decision support, synthesis, pattern recognition, and compressing the work that actually matters.

The teams producing distinctive work aren't moving faster by skipping steps. They're investing in the relationship with AI and applying taste to the output. That requires more than "write me an email."

Related: Why does everyone's AI work look the same?

🏢 The 5 Dimensions of AI Readiness

You can't "roll out AI" without understanding where your org stands. Weakness in any one of these slows adoption.

🔧

Access & Tooling

Do people have approved tools? Is access equal or ad hoc?

📊

Data Trust

Can teams tell good data from bad? Do they know what not to share?

🎯

Leadership Clarity

Has leadership stated when AI is encouraged vs. not appropriate?

🌡️

Cultural Comfort

Are people afraid of being replaced? Hiding usage or sharing learnings?

⚖️

Risk Tolerance

What happens if AI is wrong? Who reviews outputs?

Low leadership clarity or risk tolerance will stall everything else — even if tools and access are perfect.

📅 The 90-Day AI Execution Plan

A realistic, CEO-level plan that assumes AI tools already exist, people are using them lightly, and you don't need massive engineering investment.

Month 1

Clarity & Focus

  • Map where work slows down, decisions stall, or work gets redone
  • Pick ONE workflow to focus on (not email)
  • Set rules: where AI is encouraged, what requires review, what data is off-limits
  • Align managers on reviewing AI-assisted work
Month 2

Run the Experiment

  • Apply AI consistently to chosen workflow
  • Same prompts, same review steps, same owner
  • Track time saved, rework avoided, decision speed
  • Document what improved and what surprised you
Month 3

Decide & Scale

  • Leadership review: Did this actually help? What risks emerged?
  • Make a real decision: Scale, Adjust, or Stop
  • If it worked, clone to 1-2 adjacent workflows
  • Communicate clearly to the org what's next

🎯 The truth: Most leaders skip choosing one workflow, setting norms, and making a real scale decision — so AI stays shallow forever.

🏆 Real-World AI in Practice

What actual companies are doing with AI — based on public reporting. Not demos, real workflows.

Starbucks

Inventory, staffing, personalization

Starbucks uses AI across Deep Brew platform for inventory management (predicting what each store needs), labor allocation (scheduling staff based on predicted demand), and personalized recommendations in the app. AI is embedded into daily operational decisions that affect cost, customer experience, and workload — not a separate "AI initiative."

AI creates real value when it supports repeatable decisions at scale.

Johnson & Johnson

Sales support, supply chain, R&D prioritization

J&J moved away from scattered AI experiments toward fewer, high-impact use cases tied to business outcomes. They use AI in sales teams for customer insights, supply chain for demand forecasting, and R&D for prioritizing drug development pipelines. The shift was strategic: stop chasing every AI possibility and focus on what actually moves the business.

AI strategy is about saying no to low-impact ideas — not chasing everything possible.

Daily Harvest

Customer experience, operations, logistics

Daily Harvest applies AI both customer-facing (personalized meal recommendations based on dietary preferences and order history) AND behind-the-scenes (optimizing packaging, reducing food waste, improving logistics routes). The combination of CX + operations is where they found the highest ROI.

Some of the highest-ROI AI use cases live in operational details most teams overlook.

Walmart

Demand forecasting, inventory, planning

Walmart uses AI to manage complexity at massive scale — predicting demand across 4,700+ US stores, optimizing inventory levels, and coordinating supply chain logistics. AI also summarizes customer reviews to improve search and recommendations. The key: AI handles volume and variability that humans can't process manually.

AI shines where humans struggle with volume, variability, and speed.

Examples based on publicly available information and reporting.

🛠️ Templates & Tools

Strategy without tools stays theoretical. Here are two to get started — more available in the full toolkit.

📊 AI Use Case Prioritization Matrix

Score each AI idea on impact, frequency, and risk. High impact + high frequency + low risk = start here.

Best for: Deciding what to do first

🔀 Build vs Buy vs Ignore Framework

Build when it's core to differentiation. Buy when speed matters more. Ignore when impact is marginal.

Best for: Avoiding over-investment
View All Templates & Tools →

The One Rule Worth Sharing

"Use AI to move faster and think better — not to avoid responsibility."

If a leader internalizes that sentence, they're 80% of the way there.

📚 Related Reading

More thinking on AI strategy, collaboration, and what actually works.

Why Does Everyone's AI Work Look the Same?

The vending machine problem — and why relationship beats prompts.

I Have the Most Efficient AI Partner. I Still Go Slow.

What doesn't disappear: discovery, brainstorming, thinking.

Training AI to Actually Know You

Building real collaboration infrastructure, not just using tools.

The Other Side of AI

The future isn't automation — it's amplification.

Ready for More?

Check out AI frameworks for product teams, or dive into the full template library.

AI for Product People →All Templates & Tools →

Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. It reflects general leadership frameworks and analysis based on publicly available information and professional experience. It does not constitute legal, financial, HR, or compliance advice. Company examples are based on public reporting and are used for illustrative purposes only. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the companies mentioned. Final decisions and accountability remain with organizational leaders and teams.

Built by Jamie at buildwithjamie.com